Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Jermaine Curtis
as 24-11627
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JERMAINE CARL CURTIS
USA v. Jermaine Curtis
as 23-10260
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERMAINE CARL CURTIS
CURTIS v. USA
as 1:2021cv00053
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JERMAINE CARL CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fish v. Saul
as 5:2019cv06114
Plaintiff:
Carl Curtis Fish
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carl Curtis, et al v. Irwin Industries, Inc., et al
as 16-56515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL CURTIS, an individual and ARTHUR WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
IRWIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Carl Williams et al v. Irwin Industries, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02480
Plaintiff:
Carl Curtis and Arthur Williams
Defendant:
Does and Irwin Industries, Inc.
Arthur Williams et al v. Brinderson Constructors, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02474
Defendant:
Brinderson Constructors, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Carl Curtis and Arthur Williams
Carl Hodges, et al v. School Board of Orange County
as 13-12680
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARL CURTIS HODGES and HODGES BROTHERS ROOFING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Hodges et al v. School Board of Orange County, Florida
as 6:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Carl Curtis Hodges , Hodges Brothers, Inc. and Hodges Brothers Roofing, Inc.
Defendant:
School Board of Orange County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everidge et al v. Irotas Manufacturing Co., LLC 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan et al
as 3:2009cv00045
Defendant:
William H. Kiser, Sue Kiser, Irotas Manufacturing Co., LLC 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Everidge, Morris Dean Stivers and Carl Curtis Tingle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
