Ricky Howard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Ricky Howard |
| Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox, V. Edwards, J. Rachal, John Soto, James E Tilton and D. J. Williams |
| 2:2015cv02767 |
| April 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, that is, by November 17, 2016, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. (kca)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation 23 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 18 ) is granted; plaintiffs claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are dismissed with prejudice; and plaintiff's claims for monetary relief are dismissed with leave to amend. (See document for further details.) (iva)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
