Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood et al
| Stephan Brooks |
| Paco-Michelle Atwood, L Tanya M Butler, Does, Guy A Leemhuis, Jonnie Johnson Parker, Maurice Smith, Clifford Townsend, Jr., Steven Townsend and Chrisangela Walston |
| 2:2015cv07724 |
| October 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| John F. Walter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. It is Adjudged that the action: (1) is dismissed without prejudice as against the non-appearing Defendants; and (2) is otherwise dismissed in accordance with the previous Orders filed 6/20/16 and 1/5/17. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge John F. Walter, re Complaint (Discovery), 1 . The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Given the Complaint's failure to state any federal claim that might furnish a basis for this Court's jurisdiction, the Court declines to rule on the other issues raised in Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's application for an extension of time to serve unserved Defendants is denied without prejudice for the same reason. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. See Order for details. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
