Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Sexual Harrassment
Smith v. Harris
as 23-60348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Doran Maurice Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Harris, Sheriff Randall Tucker, Madison County, Mississippi and others
Smith v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Maurice Smith
Defendant:
D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MAURICE SMITH
Defendant:
D PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Magic Burgers LLC
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Maurice Smith
Defendant:
Magic Burgers LLC doing business as Burger King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SMITH et al v. LEAL-SALAS et al
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SMITH and RONNIE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
MARIO ALBERTO LEAL-SALAS, JUAN DELAERUEZ, TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Doran Maurice Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Unknown Prosecutor, Sheriff Randall Tucker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar Vasquez, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 22-55563
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Petitioner:
LANCE AARON WILSON and MAURICE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden and MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Smith v. The State of Georgia et al
as 5:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Thelonious Maurice Smith
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Jorge Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Britney
as 2:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Maurice Smith
Defendant:
R. Britney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
