Richard Owens v. Soto et al
| Richard Owens |
| A. Christinsen, R. Franklin, S. Marolla, Soto and D. Washington |
| 2:2016cv03577 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| John F. Walter |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter,IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 33 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 31 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Order granting Plaintiff IFP status (Dkt. No. 14) be VACATED; (2) the December 19, 2016, Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 29) be VACATED; and (3) Plaintiffs lawsuit be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and all claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. (sbu)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/9/2017 why the Court should not recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.Plaintiff may discharge this Order by filing: (1) a request for an extension of time to file a Third Amended Complaint along with a declaration signed under penalty of perjury that explains why he failed to comply with the Courts November 30, 2016 Order; or (2) a Third Amended Complaint that complies with the Courts October 20, 2016 and November 30, 2016 Orders. Alternatively, Plaintiff maydismiss the entire matter without prejudice by filing a signed documented entitled Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs failure to timely respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal. (rh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
