Cases 1 - 10 of 5,984
Soto v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 1:2024cv03613
Plaintiff:
Ramon Soto
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Soto v. Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
as 1:2024cv03416
Plaintiff:
Officer Michael Soto
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Argueta Soto, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2781
Petitioner:
JOSE CRISTOBAL ARGUETA SOTO, CLAUDIA LIZZETH CHIRINOS MUNGUIA, DYLAN JALETH ARGUETA CHIRINOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00357
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. El Taller Micheladas LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
El Taller Micheladas LLC doing business as El Taller Micheladas and Angel Soto doing business as El Taller Micheladas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
(SS) Soto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
Sylvia J. Soto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Soto v. Garland
as 24-2754
Petitioner:
JERSON ABRAHAM SOTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Cabrera Soto
as 5:2024cv02553
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Maria D. Cabrera Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
