Stephanie Trujillo v. Target Corporation et al
Stephanie Trujillo |
Does and Target Corporation |
2:2017cv06429 |
August 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A. Phillips |
Gail J. Standish |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER Granting Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Order Remanding to State Court (Doc. No. 8) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips granting 8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: In sum, weighing all of the factors together, the Cou rt finds that permitting the diversity-destroying joinder of Kevin Kay is appropriate. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's Motion to amend is granted the Court directs the clerk to file the proposed First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 8 at 19-26.) This case is hereby remanded to the California Superior Court, county of Los Angeles. (see document for further details) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (bm) |
Filing 16 MINUTES ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: taking under submission 8 MOTION: COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED that on the Court's own motion, the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend, and to Remand set for hearing on October 30, 2017, is hereby TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. This matter is appropriate for resolution without hearing pursuant to Local rule 7-15 and will stand submitted on the papers timely filed. (bm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.