Jeremy J. Foster v. J. Triplett et al
Jeremy J. Foster |
S. Brookman, N. Canisalez, D. Foston, J. Gastelo, N. Gonzalez, J. Henry, S. Kernan, E. Rogers, D. Samuel, D. Scheiffele, J. Steck, J. Triplett and M. Voong |
2:2017cv08796 |
December 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R. Gary Klausner |
Frederick F. Mumm |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 48 : In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l) (A)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. Pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(l)(A), no order is required to give effect to the stipulation of dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jm) |
Filing 29 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: IT IS ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (a) plaintiff's due process claims against N. Canisalez, E. Rogers, D. Scheiffele, J. Gastelo, D. Fost on, and M. Voong; (b) plaintiff's claim that J. Steck violated his due process rights by signing the RVR as part of the pre-hearing review; (c) plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and Fourth Amendment claims based on the RVR punishments; and (d) plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical needs claims. (jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.