Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Guillermo Reveles v. D. Samuels
as 2:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Reveles
Defendant:
D Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reveles v. Samuels
as 3:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Reveles
Defendant:
D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uhuru v. Bonnifield, et al.
as 24-775
Plaintiff:
KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant:
JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manager, individual and official capacity, JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, individual and official capacity, H. WARREN ALDERSON, and Predecessor, Protestant Chaplain, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
US v. Melvin Samuels
as 23-7237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN D. SAMUELS
Raymond A. Green v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06347
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Green
Defendant:
D. Samuel, A. Sanchez, S. Rizo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joey Dayshaun Dennis v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06294
Plaintiff:
Joey Dayshaun Dennis
Defendant:
D. Samuel, M. Roctla, Jim Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joey Dennis v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv04981
Petitioner:
Joey Dennis and Joey Dayshaun Dennis
Respondent:
Warden D. Samuel, M. Rocha, The People of Ventura County Superior Court of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
