Luis Alfredo Almanza v. W. L. Muniz

Luis Alfredo Almanza v. W. L. Muniz

Petitioner:	Luis Alfredo Almanza
Respondent:	W. L. Muniz
Case Number:	2:2018cv04388
Filed:	May 23, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Shashi H. Kewalramani
Presiding Judge:	Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2020	Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 24 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
August 22, 2019	Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. To date, Petitioner has not filed his Motion for Leave to Amend with his proposed FAP nor has he filed a reply. Accordingly, on or before September 5, 2019, Petitioner is ORDERED to eithe r (a) advise the Court that he does not desire to pursue this action in writing; (b) if petitioner does desire to pursue this action, show good cause in writing, if any exists, why petitioner has not timely complied with the Courts Order; or (c) file either his proposed FAP with leave to amend or reply to Respondents Answer. (dc)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2020

Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 24 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

August 22, 2019

Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. To date, Petitioner has not filed his Motion for Leave to Amend with his proposed FAP nor has he filed a reply. Accordingly, on or before September 5, 2019, Petitioner is ORDERED to eithe r (a) advise the Court that he does not desire to pursue this action in writing; (b) if petitioner does desire to pursue this action, show good cause in writing, if any exists, why petitioner has not timely complied with the Courts Order; or (c) file either his proposed FAP with leave to amend or reply to Respondents Answer. (dc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luis Alfredo Almanza v. W. L. Muniz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Luis Alfredo Almanza
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Muniz
Represented By:	Stephanie Chu Santoro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?