Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Huynh v. Martella et al
as 3:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Defendant:
C. Martella, M. Sanchez, E. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Whitall v. Stephanie Phan, et al
as 21-16463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE TRAN PHAN, M.D., Primary Care Physician, CDC and Rehabilitation, A. NEWTON, Supervising R.N. II, Salinas Valley State Prison, MS. DOWLESS, Public Health Nurse, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Arguello v. W. Muniz
as 21-15505
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC ARGUELLO
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations et al
as 3:2020cv05544
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Walters, Price, R Binkele and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver Gray v. W. Muniz
as 20-16122
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLIVER GRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2020cv03034
Defendant:
R Binkele, Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Compliance Manager, W L Muniz and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Price v. W. Muniz
as 20-55429
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, S.V.S.P., Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHLEY LUTHER MURRAY PRICE
Anthony Turner v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17440
Defendant / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, Warden at SVSP, SCOTT KERNAN, T. FOSS, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER
Ashley Price v. W. Muniz
as 19-56381
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, S.V.S.P., Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHLEY LUTHER MURRAY PRICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
