Michelle Wilkerson v. Target Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Wilkerson
Defendant: Target Corporation and Does 1 to 100
Case Number: 2:2018cv07547
Filed: August 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 7/12/2019 at 10:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 7/19/2019 at 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 7/30/2019 at 8:30 AM. (iv)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 1, 2018 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: February 4, 2019. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: February 8, 2019. (iv)
September 20, 2018 Filing 14 REPORT of Amended Joint Rule 26(f) filed by Plaintiff Michelle Wilkerson. (Hitzke, Daniel)
September 20, 2018 Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Classen, R)
September 7, 2018 Filing 12 DECLARATION of R. Derek Classen Lead Trial Counsel Re: Compliance with Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Classen, R)
September 7, 2018 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Target Corporation.(Classen, R)
September 4, 2018 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Michelle Wilkerson, (Hitzke, Daniel)
August 31, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of scheduling conference etc. filed by plaintiff Michelle Wilkerson. (Hitzke, Daniel)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 1, 2018 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 20, 2018. (iv)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
August 30, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
August 30, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa)
August 29, 2018 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 to 100, Target Corporation, filed by plaintiff Michelle Wilkerson. (Filed in state court 7/27/2018, submitted as document 1, p. 4) (esa)
August 29, 2018 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE of Statement of Defendant filed by Defendant Target Corporation (Classen, R)
August 29, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Classen, R)
August 29, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation, identifying Target Corporation. (Classen, R)
August 29, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County, case number BC715873 Receipt No: 0973-22336276 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attorney R Derek Classen added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Classen, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michelle Wilkerson v. Target Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Wilkerson
Represented By: Daniel Lee Hitzke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: R Derek Classen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?