Tracey Reinberg v. Herman Miller, Inc. et al
| Tracey Reinberg |
| DOES 1 through 10, Design Within Reach, Inc., RAJ OVERSEAS, Herman Miller, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2018cv08980 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Gail J Standish |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #13 to fle response to Complaint, by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. The time for Defendant DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC. to respond to Plaintiff TRACEY REINBERGs Complaint is extended to January 11, 2019. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Design Within Reach, Inc. answer now due 1/11/2019, filed by Defendant Design Within Reach, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lukas, Edward) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. upon Herman Miller, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/13/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Edward W. Lukas, Jr. - Harrington Foxx. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. upon RAJ Overseas waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/12/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Steven R. Gursky, Esq. - Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Design Within Reach, Inc. answer now due 12/13/2018, filed by Defendant Design Within Reach, Inc..(Attorney Edward W Lukas, Jr added to party Design Within Reach, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lukas, Edward) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg, upon Defendant Design Within Reach, Inc. served on 10/23/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon National Registered Agents c/o Francine Rodriguez - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND MAY DIFFER IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., RAJ Overseas. (jp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jp) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Tracey Reinberg. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg, (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22597778 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Tracey Reinberg(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
