Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Herman Miller, Inc. et al v. Classic Maker Ltd., et al
as 1:2020cv00312
Plaintiff:
Herman Miller, Inc., Design Within Reach, Inc. and The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Interior Icons and Classic Maker Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
O'Neill v. Design Within Reach, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00285
Defendant:
Design Within Reach, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bridget O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Tracey Reinberg v. Herman Miller, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08980
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, Design Within Reach, Inc., RAJ OVERSEAS and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey Reinberg
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gomez, Jr. v. Design Within Reach, Inc.
as 1:2018cv07648
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Design Within Reach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
