Herman Miller, Inc. et al v. Classic Maker Ltd., et al
| Herman Miller, Inc., Design Within Reach, Inc. and The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum |
| Unknown Parties, Interior Icons and Classic Maker Ltd. |
| 1:2020cv00312 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the determination of a TRADEMARK ACTION (mg) |
Filing 30
ORDER denying #28 motion to stay; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER granting STIPULATION #27 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 28 MOTION to stay Closure of Case for 30 Days Pending Plaintiffs' Forthcoming Proposal As To Unnamed DOE Defendants by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc.; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 27 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Consent Judgment by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Judgment) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER requiring closing documents to be submitted by 10/23/2020; Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2020 is canceled; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
| Filing 25 JOINT STATUS REPORT submitted for filing by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum Notifying the Court of Execution of Settlement Agreement (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| MOTION for order regarding deadlines (as taken from #25 ) by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum ; (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) (mg) Modified text on 9/30/2020 (filed under the directive of chambers) (mg). |
|
Filing 24
ORDER granting STIPULATION #23 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 23 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER (Final Joint Request to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint) by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| (DISREGARD) Copy of Order on Stipulation and Proposed Order #22 sent via U.S. Mail to Aaron Morse (mg) Modified text on 8/31/2020; filed in error (mg). |
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting STIPULATION #21 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Interior Icons to Respond to Complaint until September 3, 2020 by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting STIPULATION #18 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 10/7/2020 at 03:00 PM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; status report due by 9/30/2020 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to First Amended Complaint until August 27, 2020 by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Interior Icons, Unknown Parties filed by Herman Miller, Inc., Design Within Reach, Inc., The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting STIPULATION #15 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to Complaint to August 3, 2020 by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of the Parties to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Complaint until July 20, 2020 by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Herman Miller, Inc., Design Within Reach, Inc. as to Interior Icons waiver sent on 5/7/2020, answer due 7/6/2020 (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying at this time #10 motion for alternate service; granting #10 motion for discovery, subject to condition set out in this order ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in support of Motion for Alternate Service,, Motion for Discovery, #10 (Supplemental Declaration Relating to Motion) filed by Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for alternate service on Interior Icons, MOTION for discovery on an expedited early basis by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc.; (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Affidavit of Jonathan Moskin, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Affidavit of Fred Pretrovsky, #8 Affidavit of Lori Simpson, #9 Proposed Order) (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Interior Icons (mg) |
| Filing 8 CORRECTED PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) Modified text on 4/16/2020 (mg). |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (mg) |
| Filing 5 REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the filing of a TRADEMARK ACTION (mg) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Interior Icons, Unknown Parties (filing fee not paid and none provided) (mg) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5126973 (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Report to the USPTO of Filing of an Action Regarding Trademarks by plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Kashcheyeva, Irina) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Design Within Reach, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Herman Miller, Inc. for Design Within Reach, Inc. (Kashcheyeva, Irina) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Herman Miller, Inc. (Kashcheyeva, Irina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against DOES, Interior Icons filed by Herman Miller, Inc., Design Within Reach, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H) (Kashcheyeva, Irina) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jean-Paul Ciardullo on behalf of plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jonathan E. Moskin on behalf of plaintiffs Design Within Reach, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. (Moskin, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
