Taha A. Ramadan v. The State of California et al
Plaintiff: Taha A. Ramadan
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive, California Credits Group, LLC, The State of California, Verizon Wireless, Inc., The California Bar Association, Jackson Lewis, LLP and Kelly Hanker
Case Number: 2:2019cv00265
Filed: January 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L Real
Referring Judge: Suzanne H Segal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real: Denying #4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. (gk)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
February 6, 2019 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Verizon Wireless, Inc.. (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant The State of California. (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Kelly Hanker. (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Jackson Lewis, LLP. (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant California Credits Group, LLC. (hr)
February 6, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant The California Bar Association. (hr)
February 5, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Upon further review, a determination has been made that this case is not appropriate for review and issuance of a report and recommendation by a magistrate judge pursuant to Genera Order 05-07. Accordingly, all filings should be directed to the attention of Judge Manual Real for review.Case now reads as 2:19-cv-00265 R(SSx). (rn)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
January 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (car)
January 11, 2019 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Taha A. Ramadan. (car)
January 11, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Taha A. Ramadan. (car)
January 11, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Taha A. Ramadan (car)
January 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants. Case assigned to Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, filed by plaintiff Taha A. Ramadan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taha A. Ramadan v. The State of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Credits Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Wireless, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The California Bar Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson Lewis, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Hanker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taha A. Ramadan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?