Cases 1 - 10 of 11,456
Bank of New York Mellon v. Chidester, et al.
as 24-4501
Defendant:
MR. COOPER, GROUP INC., CYNTHIA CHIDESTER, NITA CHIDESTER and others
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Successor in intereted to JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA As Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust AR7 Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series formerly known as The Bank of New York
Singh v. Robertson, et al.
as 24-4423
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest and JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. SINGH
May Chen v. DC, et al
as 24-7105
Defendant:
District of Columbia, State of California and State of Maryland
Plaintiff:
May Chen
Robert Latham et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
K. Latham, Robert Latham and Bonnie Latham
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, City of Barstow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cormier v. People of the State of California, et al.
as 24-4278
Defendant:
DOE, RAMOS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff:
IAN LAMONTE CORMIER
People of the State of California v. Rish Investments, Inc., et al.
as 24-4283
Defendant:
RISH INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation and GAZI MONIRUL ISLAM
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Federal Trade Commission et al v. NGL Labs, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05753
Defendant:
Joao Figueiredo, Raj Vir and NGL Labs, LLC
Plaintiff:
The People Of The State Of California and Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Hamilton v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4162
Defendant:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, CLARENCE CRYER, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04102
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
