Edward A. Contreras v. Vistar Transportation, LLC et al
| Edward A Contreras |
| Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, Vistar Transportation, LLC and Performance Transportation, LLC |
| 2:2019cv07972 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC.(Beverlin, Amy) |
Filing 21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Dkt. #20 (ake)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement AND REQUEST TO VACATE CASE SCHEDULE PENDING DISMISSAL filed by Defendant Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Beverlin, Amy) |
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL TO FILE JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to this Court's Standing Order and the Order re Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (Dkt. #18 ), the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report ("Report") was to have been filed no later than January 27, 2020. No Report has been filed. The parties shall file the Report, along with the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates ("Schedule") attached as Exhibit A, no later than January 29, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (DKT. #17 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation shall be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART, the Court orders the following: (1) Defendants' time within which to answer or otherwise serve and file any motions or other pleadings responsive to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action is extended by 21 days to and including 2/11/2020; (2) The date by which the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report is continued from 1/21/2020 to 1/27/2020. (3) By entering into this Stipulation, the Parties do not waive and expressly reserve all claims, defenses and challenges in this action including, without limitation, with respect to Defendants' intended motion to dismiss and/or strike the Complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and (f) and/or with respect to any First Amended Complaint that Plaintiff may file on or prior to 2/11/2020. (jp) Modified on 1/24/2020 (ake).
|
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Performance Transportation, LLC answer now due 2/11/2020; Vistar Transportation, LLC answer now due 2/11/2020, re Order Extending Answer Due Deadline,, #16 filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC; Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beverlin, Amy) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER RE SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (DKT. #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation shall be and hereby is GRANTED as follows: (1) Defendants time within which to answer or otherwise serve and file any motions or other pleadings responsive to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action is extended by 45 days to and including 1/21/2020. (2) The Parties' time within which to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report in this action is extended by 45 days to and including 1/21/2020, to avoid the intervening 1/20/2020 holiday (FRCP 6). (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint - (Discovery), Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #13 filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Re Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (DKT. #13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt the Stipulation shall be and hereby is GRANTED as follows: Defendants' time within which to answer or otherwise serve and file any motions or other pleadings responsive to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action shall be and hereby is extended until 12/6/2019. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 6, 2019 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Performance Transportation, LLC answer now due 10/21/2019; Vistar Transportation, LLC answer now due 10/21/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC; Vistar Transportation, LLC.(Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/6/2019. (ake)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:17-cv-00357 JAK (SKx). Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07972 JAK (SKx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (esa)
|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Performance Transportation, LLC answer now due 10/11/2019; Vistar Transportation, LLC answer now due 10/11/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC; Vistar Transportation, LLC.(Kane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Edward A Contreras in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/2/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. Related Case(s): 2:17-cv-00357-JAK-SK (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC, identifying Edward A. Contreras, Plaintiff; Vistar Transportation, LLC, Defendant and subsidiary of Performance Food Group, Inc.("PFG") and PFST Holding, Co.; Performance Transportation, LLC, Defendant and subsidiary of PFG and PFST Holding, Co.; PFST Holding, Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFG; Performance Food Group, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFGC, Inc.; PFGC, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Performance Food Group Company; Pefrormance Food Group Company, a publicly-held Delaware corporation traded on the NYSE ("PFGC"). (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV26949 Receipt No: 0973-24437080 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Performance Transportation, LLC, Vistar Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Case Cover Sheet & Addendum, #4 Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Notice of Deposit of Advance Jury Fee, #6 Court Order Re Newly Filed Class Action, #7 Certificate of Mailing Minute Order Re Newly Fliled Class Action, #8 Proof of Service of Summons on Performance Transportation, LLC, #9 Proof of Service of Summons on Vistar Transportation, LLC) (Attorney Matthew Charles Kane added to party Performance Transportation, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew Charles Kane added to party Vistar Transportation, LLC(pty:dft))(Kane, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
