Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY FISHER and JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher
Plaintiff:
MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza, EDWARD A. CONTRERAS, BOYD LEWIS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Maria Mendoza, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and EDWARD A. CONTRERAS
Plaintiff:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher, BOYD LEWIS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 22-16480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher, MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
BOYD LEWIS, ELIZABETH LEWIS, Next of kin of Elizabeth, Ellen, Warren, and Jeff Lewis, LLOYD D. HALL and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 20-16485
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SIDNEY TAIZE, As Parent, Natural guardian and Next Friend of Jonathan Taize, Lisa Taize and Joshua Taize, AKA Sidney Taiz, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOYCE BROWN HUTTON, Next of kin of Mondre Hutton, ROY FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Edward A. Contreras v. Vistar Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07972
Defendant:
Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, Vistar Transportation, LLC and Performance Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Edward A Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District
as 14-16945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District
as 14-15204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
State of Arizona, et al v. Tucson Unified School District
as 13-15691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 10-15407
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY FISHER, JOSIE FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant-intervenor:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
as 10-15375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FISHER and JOSIE FISHER
Plaintiff:
MARIA MENDOZA and EDWARD A. CONTRERAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SALLY J. SUTTON, JOHN R. CENTENO and others
Plaintiff-intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
