Martha Lucia Ponce v. Target Corporation et al
| Martha Ponce |
| Target Corporation, Does 1 to 50, Inclusive and Cara Richardson |
| 2:2019cv10115 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp) |
| Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court - Stanley Mosk Courthouse. Case number: 19STCV32849. (jp) |
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING MOTION to Remand #17 . (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY in support of motion Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Martha Ponce. (Khorshidi, Omid) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by Defendant Target Corporation.(Classen, R) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION in opposition re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk #17 filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Classen, R) |
| Filing 17 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk filed by PLAINTIFF Martha Ponce. Motion set for hearing on 1/27/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] Order re Motion to Remand) (Khorshidi, Omid) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANTS All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by PLAINTIFF Martha Ponce(Khorshidi, Omid) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:19-cv-10115 DSF (JPRx). (esa) |
| Filing 11 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Khorshidi, Omid) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Martha Ponce, Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation served on 11/04/2019. (Khorshidi, Omid) |
| Filing 9 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Target Corporation (Classen, R) |
|
Filing 8
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar.Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than December 12, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this Order by filing a proof of service. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Target Corporation.(Classen, R) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C- Statement of Consent) (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Target Corporation, Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Martha Ponce. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE of Statement of Defendant filed by Defendant Target Corporation (Classen, R) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Classen, R) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation, identifying Target Corporation. (Classen, R) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County, case number 19STCV32849 Receipt No: 0973-24855532 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attorney R Derek Classen added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Classen, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
