LaToya Diamond v. Target Corporation et al
| LaToya Diamond |
| Target Corporation and Does 1 to 50 |
| 2:2019cv10273 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:19-cv-2367 JVS (ADSx). (ghap) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF TARGET CORPORATION AND CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation, identifying LaToya Diamond and Target Corporation. (Trachtman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Trachtman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01093474-CU-PO-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24887706 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Attorney Benjamin R Trachtman added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Trachtman, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
