Peter Kleidman v. The Hon. Thomas L. Willhite, Jr. et al
| Peter Kleidman |
| The Hon. Normal L. Epstein, Does 1-10, The Hon. Goodwin H. Liu, Judicial Council of California, California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, The Hon. Carol A. Corrigan, Supreme Court of California, The Hon. Kathryn M. Werdegar, The Hon. Audrey B. Collins, The Hon. Mariano- Florentino Cuellar, The Hon. Thomas L. Willhite, Jr., Division Four of the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye, The Hon. Ming W. Chin and The Hon. Leondra R. Kruger |
| 2:2020cv02365 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| John D Early |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by defendants Goodwin H. Liu, Supreme Court of California, Thomas L. Willhite, Jr, Leondra R. Kruger, Division Four of the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Audrey B. Collins, Ming W. Chin, Mariano- Florentino Cuellar, Judicial Council of California, Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye, Carol A. Corrigan, California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District. upon Goodwin H. Liu waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Supreme Court of California waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Thomas L. Willhite, Jr waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Leondra R. Kruger waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Division Four of the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Audrey B. Collins waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Ming W. Chin waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Mariano- Florentino Cuellar waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Judicial Council of California waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Carol A. Corrigan waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2020, answer due 6/19/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Kevin M. McCormick. (McCormick, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Peter Kleidman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. 1, 12/26/14 Docket in Kleidman v. RFF, #2 Exhibit Exh. 2 - 7/10/18 Opinion in Cal. Court of Appeal Case B268541)(Kleidman, Peter) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition Order to Show Cause Re: Order to Show Cause,, #8 (Kleidman, Peter) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge John D. Early.Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed by filing a written response within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order setting forth any valid legal and/or factual reasons or arguments why the Court should not find that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER UPON FILING OF COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (see document for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (hr)
|
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye, Ming W. Chin, Audrey B. Collins, Carol A. Corrigan, Mariano- Florentino Cuellar, Division Four of the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Normal L. Epstein, Judicial Council of California, Leondra R. Kruger, Goodwin H. Liu, Supreme Court of California, Kathryn M. Werdegar, Thomas L. Willhite, Jr. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Peter Kleidman. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Peter Kleidman, identifying Other Affiliate REF Family Partnership, LP, Other Affiliate Robert F. Freedman for Peter Kleidman. (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by Plaintiff Peter Kleidman. Fee $400.00 PAID (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet (car) Modified on 3/16/2020 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
