Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Peter Kleidman v. Elwood Lui
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Elwood Lui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kleidman v. Murphy, et al.
as 24-320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KLEIDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNIE MURPHY, JONATHAN GASKIN, MICHAEL MAIDY and others
Peter Kleidman v. RFF Family Partnership, LP, et al
as 23-55610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KLEIDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RFF FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP and TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, Chief Justice
Kleidman v. Buchanan et al
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Justice Martin N. Buchanan, Justice Jose S. Castillo and Justice Richard D. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kleidman v. Danner et al
as 5:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Justice Allison M. Danner, Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Justice Charles E. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Kleidman v. Audrey Collins, et al
as 23-55128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KLEIDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AUDREY B. COLLINS, Justice, THOMAS L. WILLHITE, Jr., Justice and BRIAN S. CURREY, Justice
Kleidman v. Murphy et al
as 5:2022cv06355
Petitioner:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Bernie Murphy, Jonathan Gaskin, Michael Maidy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peter Kleidman v. Martin Barash, et al
as 22-55970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KLEIDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN R. BARASH and MAUREEN A. TIGHE, Chief Judge
Peter Kleidman v. RFF Family Partnership, LP et al
as 2:2022cv03947
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
RFF Family Partnership, LP and Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil Sakauye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Kleidman v. Audrey B. Collins et al
as 2:2022cv03263
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleidman
Defendant:
Justice Audrey B. Collins, Justice Thomas L. Willhite, Jr. and Justice Brian S. Currey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
