Kleidman v. Buchanan et al
| Peter Kleidman |
| Justice Martin N. Buchanan, Justice Jose S. Castillo and Justice Richard D. Huffman |
| 3:2023cv01251 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| William Q Hayes |
| John A Houston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge John A. Houston is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge William Q. Hayes for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv01251-WQH-JLB.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (bdc) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (mjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Justice Martin N. Buchanan, Justice Jose S. Castillo, Justice Richard D. Huffman ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 146637.), filed by Peter Kleidman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1251-JAH-JLB. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(mjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
