Wayne Lefon Briggs v. R.C. Johnson
Wayne Lefon Briggs |
R. C. Johnson |
2:2020cv02387 |
March 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Josephine L Staton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CDCR Inmate Trust Account filed by Petitioner Wayne Lefon Briggs. (clee) |
Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. THEREFORE, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before April 20, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice based on Younger abstention with his motion to stay the action being denied as moot. Petitioner may satisfy this order by voluntarily dismissing this action, using the attached Form CV-09, without prejudice to refiling after a final state court judgment has been entered and all federal claims he wants to raise here have been exhausted in the California appellate courts. But if Petitioner files no timely response to this order or notice of voluntary dismissal, the Court may recommend involuntary dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) L.R. 41-1. IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Voluntary Dismissal Form) (clee) |
Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis contained within the Petition. (ECFNo. 1). The request is GRANTED. (hr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance, filed by Petitioner Wayne Lefon Briggs. (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Wayne Lefon Briggs. The Petitioner does not consent. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254. ) Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Wayne Lefon Briggs. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wayne Lefon Briggs v. R.C. Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Wayne Lefon Briggs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: R. C. Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.