Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Blake v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-1791
Plaintiff:
LESTER PHILLIP BLAKE, JR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, D. GODFREY, Correctional Sergeant, Invidual, Correctional Officer D. BARBOUR, individual and others
Leon Dwayne Hardin v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Leon Dwayne Hardin
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Jon Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario A. Gonzalez v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv05727
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, R. C. Johnson, D. Ulstadt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Briggs v. R. Johnson
as 23-55619
Petitioner / Appellant:
WAYNE LEFON BRIGGS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Charles F. Justus IV v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv05817
Plaintiff:
Charles Justus, IV
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, M. Soleimani and S. Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Phillips v. R. Johnson
as 23-70091
Petitioner:
NATHAN D. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04135
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Wayne Phillips, Sr. v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv02977
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Phillips, Sr. and Kevin Wayne Dunigan
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Ms. Roche, Edward Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCowan v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv01680
Petitioner:
Raymond B. McCowan
Respondent:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
