David Bardinet v. Officer Tolino et al
Plaintiff: DAVID BARDINET
Defendant: Officer Perkins, #36787, DOES 1-25,, Officer Tolino, # 42738, CITY OF LOS ANGELES;, Officer Perkins, Does 1-25, inclusive, Officer Tolino and City of Los Angeles
Case Number: 2:2020cv02899
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Patrick J Walsh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Richard T. Copeland may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Perkins, Tolino(Lee, Lisa)
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for June 15, 2020 at 11:00 AM. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
April 6, 2020 Filing 8 Defendants' CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Perkins, Tolino, (Lee, Lisa)
April 6, 2020 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defedants City of Los Angeles, Perkins, Tolino.(Lee, Lisa)
April 1, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Perkins, Tolino, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,,,, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 served on April 1, 2020. (Lee, Lisa)
March 31, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
March 31, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (lh)
March 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff David Bardinet, upon Defendant Perkins served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Walker, No. 13619, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/02/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
March 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Does, Perkins, Tolino. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff David Bardinet. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/18/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
March 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff David Bardinet, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Walker, No. 13619, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/2/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
March 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff David Bardinet, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 2/27/2020, answer due 3/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Crystal Jones, Deputy Clerk, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/20/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
March 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff David Bardinet, upon Defendant Tolino served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Walker, No. 13619, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/02/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
March 27, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES;, Officer Perkins, #36787, Officer Tolino, # 42738. (Lee, Lisa)
March 27, 2020 Filing 2 DEFENDANTS' CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES;, Officer Perkins, #36787, Officer Tolino, # 42738, (Lee, Lisa)
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV45757 Receipt No: ACACDC-25886209 - Fee: $400, filed by DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES;, Officer Perkins, #36787, Officer Tolino, # 42738. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court - Notice of Case Assignment, #4 Exhibit 4 - State Court - Peremptory Challenge to Judicial Officer, #5 Exhibit 5 - State Court - Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice, #6 Exhibit 6 - State Court - Certificate of Mailing, #7 Exhibit 7 - State Court - Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Exhibit 8 - State Court - Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, #9 Exhibit 9 - State Court - Notice of Case Management Conference, #10 Exhibit 10 - State Court - Proof of Service of summons - City of Los Angeles, #11 Exhibit 11 - State Court - Proof of Service of Summons - City of Los Angeles on behalf of Officer Tolino, #42738, #12 Exhibit 12 - State Court - Proof of Service of Summons - City of Los Angeles on behalf of Officer Perkins, #36787, #13 Exhibit 13 - State Court - First Amended Proof of Service of Summons - Officer Tolino, #42738, #14 Exhibit 14 - State Court - First Amended Proof of Service of Summons - Officer Perkins, #36787, #15 Exhibit 15 - State Court - Summons served on Defendant Officer Gaetano Tolino #42738, #16 Exhibit 16 - Stat Court - Summons served on Defendant Officer Lance Perkins #36787, #17 Exhibit 17 - State Court - Summons served on Defendant City of Los Angeles) (Attorney Lisa W Lee added to party CITY OF LOS ANGELES; (pty:dft), Attorney Lisa W Lee added to party Officer Perkins, #36787(pty:dft), Attorney Lisa W Lee added to party Officer Tolino, # 42738(pty:dft))(Lee, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Bardinet v. Officer Tolino et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID BARDINET
Represented By: Kevin Shawn Conlogue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Perkins, #36787
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-25,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Tolino, # 42738
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES;
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Perkins
Represented By: Michael Nelson Feuer
Represented By: Kathleen A Kenealy
Represented By: Cory M Brente
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Tolino
Represented By: Michael Nelson Feuer
Represented By: Kathleen A Kenealy
Represented By: Cory M Brente
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Represented By: Michael Nelson Feuer
Represented By: Kathleen A Kenealy
Represented By: Cory M Brente
Represented By: Lisa W Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?