Cases 1 - 10 of 2,486
Barry Glenn Williams et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Barry Glenn Williams and Damien Deron Williams
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Carmen Trutanich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilmer Alexander Guevara et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Guevara, Jenny Guevara and Edgardo Portillo
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, E-Z Trans and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Duran v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03919
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duran
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Arthur Contreras and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Sullivan Equity Partners, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
as 24-2893
Plaintiff:
SULLIVAN EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Charter City
Margret Hill et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03484
Plaintiff:
Margret Hill and Trenita Wilson
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Rasey-Smith et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Rasey-Smith, Gordon Gene Maccani and Janet Maccani
Petitioner:
Does 1-10
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillip Haywood v. Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office et al
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
Phillip Haywood
Defendant:
Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office, Adobe Google Microsoft, SRO Housing Corporation DTLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
