Jerron Donald Harris v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Jerron Donald Harris |
| Xavier Becerra, Warden Raymond Madden, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Raymond Madden |
| 2:2020cv06935 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| John E McDermott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #16 (Attachments: #1 LD #1, #2 LD #2, #3 LD #3, #4 LD #4, #5 LD #5, #6 LD #6)(Harris, Julie)
|
|
Filing 16
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES re: for Order #4 filed by Respondent California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Harris, Julie)
|
|
Filing 15
REFUND OF $395.00 made payable on 09/03/2020 to Corey E Parker for payment made on 07/31/2020 Re: Order on Application for Refund of Fees Paid (G-124) #9 . (rdj)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE (Docket No. 4) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Respondent shall file an Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion for Stay no later than September 16, 2020. Petitioner may file a Reply no later than September 30, 2020. Thereafter, the Motion for Stay will be taken under submission. (See document for details.) (es)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and that Respondent is granted until October 4, 2020, to file a motion to dismiss or answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. #12 (es)
|
|
Filing 12
First APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File UNOPPOSED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to file a motion to dismiss or answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. filed by RESPONDENT California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] Order) (Harris, Julie)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Julie A. Harris on behalf of respondent California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Attorney Julie Ann Harris added to party California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation(pty:res))(Harris, Julie)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition or a Motion to Dismiss the Petition not later than 28 days after the filing date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition Attach 1 of 3, #2 Consent Attach 2 of 3, #3 Consent Attach 3 of 3) (es)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: GRANTING #5 APPLICATION for Refund of Fees (G-124). (es)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case #4 , Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Docket item 1 and 4 were e-filed under the wrong event. The Clerk has modified the docket entries. In addition The Election Regarding Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge was attached to the Petition item 1. The Clerk has retrieved and docketed the form please see item 6. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (car)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION for Refund of Fees Paid Re: Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Jerron Donald Harris. (Parker, Corey)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before a United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Jerron Donald Harris. (car)
|
|
Filing 4
[MOTION FOR ORDER FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE] MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE Receipt No: ACACDC-27450232 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff Jerron Donald Harris.(Parker, Corey) Modified on 8/3/2020 (car). Modified on 8/3/2020 (car).
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Jerron Donald Harris. (Parker, Corey)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Jerron Donald Harris. (Parker, Corey)
|
|
Filing 1
[PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY 28 U.S.C. 2254] Filed as APPLICATION Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Addendum and Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge Receipt No: ACACDC-27449767 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jerron Donald Harris. (Attorney Corey Evan Parker added to party Jerron Donald Harris(pty:pet))(Parker, Corey) Modified on 8/3/2020 (car).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
