Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Torres v. Paredes et al
as 3:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Eucebio Torres
Defendant:
Officer G. Paredes, Officer A. Navarro, Officer J. Cazares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Dan Michael Young v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2021cv06069
Petitioner:
Dan Michael Young
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rudolfo Alcantar v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2020cv09718
Petitioner:
Rudolfo Alcantar
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roque Solis v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2020cv08474
Petitioner:
Roque Solis
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jerron Donald Harris v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2020cv06935
Petitioner:
Jerron Donald Harris
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra, Warden Raymond Madden, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Debato v. Madden et al
as 3:2019cv01211
Defendant:
E.M. Ramirez, Warden Raymond Madden and Lieutenant J. Bonilla
Plaintiff:
Haneze Debate and Haneze Debato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gage v. Madden
as 1:2019at00171
Defendant:
Warden Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Corderick Dewayne Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giovanni Perez v. Raymond Madden et al
as 2:2018cv10503
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden, People of the State of California and Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Giovanni Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tom Love Vinson v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2018cv06783
Petitioner:
Tom Love Vinson
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dwight Evans v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2018cv05980
Petitioner:
Dwight Evans and Warden Raymond Madden
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
