Richard John Bobka v. Warden et al
| Richard John Bobka |
| Warden, BOP and DOJ |
| 2:2020cv11521 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Karen E Scott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Petitioner's Notice of Change of Address (Dkt. 8) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: The clerk is instructed to mail a copy of the Court's Order Requiring Response to Petition (Dkt. 3) and the Court's Order Granting Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time (Dkt. 7) to Petitioner at his new address of record. (Attachments: #1 Attach (2 of 3) Dkt.3, #2 Attach (3 of 3) Dkt.7) (es) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 #6 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: The government shall file any motion to dismiss the petition on or before February 24, 2021. Petitioner shall file any reply within 20 days of the date of service thereof. (es)
|
| Filing 6 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 filed by RESPONDENT DOJ. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hu, Julia) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned (rts attempted not known) addressed to Richard John Bobka 54833-018 FCI Victorville Medium II 13777 Air Expressway Blvd, Victorville CA 92394 re Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition, #3 (es) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of address Changing petitioners address to Federal Correctional Institution No. 2, P O Box 3850, Adelanto CA 92301. Filed by Petitioner Richard John Bobka. (es) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Julia Hu on behalf of Respondents BOP, DOJ, Warden. Assistant United States Attorney Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV terminated. (Attorney Julia Hu added to party BOP(pty:res), Attorney Julia Hu added to party DOJ(pty:res), Attorney Julia Hu added to party Warden (pty:res))(Hu, Julia) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorney's Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent form CV-11B) (jdo)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned addressed to Richard Bobka re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge #2 . (iv) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott,(Filing fee $ 5 paid), filed by petitioner Richard John Bobka. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
