Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fisher v. Bowers et al
as 1:2026cv14969
Respondent:
BOP DSCC and Bowers
Petitioner:
William Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Darryl Shears, III
as 26-3206
Defendant:
Darryl Benard Shears, III, also known as Lil Bop
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Washington v. DOJ
as 26-40663
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Hill v. Bina, et al
as 26-1413
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. HILL
Defendant:
CHRIS BINA, Medical Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Pharmacist of the BOP, JAIME AUTEN, Central Office Pharmacist of BOP and others
Rylee Silva-Vidinha v. United States of America, et al
as 26-3017
Plaintiff:
Rylee Silva-Vidinha, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Starsha Silva, and on her own behalf
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Segal, Warden, FCI Waseca, in his individual capacity, Sheila Johnson, in her individual capacity and others
Martin Jonassen v. BOP, et al
as 26-3007
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen
Defendant:
BOP, Parham, Chaplain, Smith, Chaplain and others
USA v. Dion Oliver
as 26-3448
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dion Oliver, a/k/a Ollie, a/k/a Sadiqwakil Aleem, a/k/a Sadizwaleez Aleem, a/k/a Fine Wine, a/k/a Bop, a/k/a Bopper
Miramar Brands Group, Inc. v. Rag & Bone Holdings, LLC
as 1:2026cv08178
Plaintiff:
Miramar Brands Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Rag & Bone Holdings LLC, Rue Gilt Groupe, Inc., Bop LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Costen v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2026cv02650
Plaintiff:
Robert Costen
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Medical Staff (BOP), Warden (Schuylkill, PA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PC) Scionti v. BOP
as 2:2026cv03028
Plaintiff:
Eric Scionti
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
