Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Glass v. BOP
as 1:2024mi00024
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
In re: Thomas Hill
as 24-1246
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS AUSTIN HILL, a/k/a Bop Hill, a/k/a Thomas Austin Stezo, a/k/a Stezo Hill, a/k/a Tommy Hill, a/k/a Thomas Austin Hill, Jr., a/k/a Vincent White
Razzoli v. Richmond University Medical Center
as 24-544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant:
RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Dr. DOUGLAS COHEN, Dr. AMI RAVAL and others
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M GUTIERREZ, complex warden, Unknown UNKNOWN CHRISTENSEN, PREA Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, federal agency and others
USA v. Dion Oliver
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DION OLIVER, AKA Ollie, AKA Sadiqwakil Aleem, AKA Sadizwaleez Aleem, AKA Fine Wine, AKA Bop, AKA Bopper
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. MooreGreene LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc, Cotillion Music Inc, Terry Stafford Music Co and others
Defendant:
MooreGreene LLC each individually doing business as Delaney's Irish Pub and Brian Greene
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frank Pate v. BOP
as 21-5285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Pate
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director of BOP
Earl Bryant v. John Yates
as 21-3788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Earl Wayne Bryant
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, BOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
