Robert Rand v. Michael Carvajal et al
Plaintiff: Robert Rand
Defendant: Michael Carvajal, Patricia Bradley and The Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 2:2021cv00720
Filed: January 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Robert Rand. (es)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPPOSITION filed by Respondents Patricia Bradley, Michael Carvajal, The Bureau of Prisons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Attorney Gregory Douglas Bernstein added to party Patricia Bradley(pty:res), Attorney Gregory Douglas Bernstein added to party Michael Carvajal(pty:res), Attorney Gregory Douglas Bernstein added to party The Bureau of Prisons(pty:res))(Bernstein, Gregory)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Requiring Response to Petition (Federal Custody) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action, IT IS ORDERED: Respondent shall file and serve a response to the petition within 30 days of the date of this order addressing the following issues: [SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS.] (Attachments: #1 Attach.1, #2 Attach.2) (es)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Robert Rand, re REQUEST for Order #8 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Expedite Judicial Decision #9 served on 2/17/2021. (es)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Expedite Judicial Decision filed by plaintiff Robert Rand. (es)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REQUEST filed by plaintiff Robert Rand. (es)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (es)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Robert Rand, re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) - optional html form #3 , Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 served on 2/2/2021. (es)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 from RBC Wealth Management. Re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 . Receipt number LA218227. (fr)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order re: Failure to Pay the Filing Fee or File Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Accordingly, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, within 30 days of the date of this Order, he must (1) pay the full $402.00 filing fee; or (2) if he cannot pay the full filing fee, submit a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees along with the necessary accompanying documents (signed Prisoner Authorization and Certificate of Authorized Officer and a certified institutional trust account statement); or (3) show cause in writing why you are unable to do so. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, if in forma pauperis status is granted, you will only be obligated to pay the filing fee of $350.00. [see document for further details.] (Attachments: #1 Attach.CV 60P) (es)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (lh)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Patricia Bradley, Michael Carvajal, The Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Filed by Defendant Robert Rand. (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Rand v. Michael Carvajal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Rand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Carvajal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?