Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Guzman Lorea v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02794
Plaintiff: Joaquin A. Guzman Lorea
Defendant: B. True, B. (I) True, Holbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scholl v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01774
Petitioner: Lesley Scholl
Respondent: Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARD v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00382
Petitioner: THEODORE RICHARD
Respondent: B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mark Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-5217
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mark Jordan
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Carvajal, Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02624
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harper v. Carvajal
as 5:2021hc02212
Petitioner: Adolph Harper
Respondent: Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dwight Jorgensen, et al v. B. Birkholz, et al
as 21-3168
Petitioner / Appellant: Dwight Chris Jorgensen, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Paxton Anderson, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent / Appellee: B. Birkholz, Warden of Federal Prison Camp Duluth, in their official capacities and Michael D. Carvajal, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in their official capacities
LANGAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02524
Plaintiff: DONNA LANGAN
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ELIZABETH STAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. WARDEN FCI TERRA HAUTE
as 2:2021cv00367
Petitioner: LUSTA JOHNSON, SR
Respondent: B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?