Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
| Stephen Christopher Plunkett |
| Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden, Edge, AW, Kessel, AW, Sheila Woodard, Dr., M. Tomar, MAT, Candyce Nicholls, RN, N. Futrell, Juchau, Dr., Melton, Gibson, Shahan, Jones, CSS, Ward, C.O., Austen, C.O., Ford, C.O., Garrett, Warden, FCC Forrest City, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., President, Heriberto Tellez, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ray, Health Services Administrator, FCC Forrest City, Stahlhood, AW, FCC Forrest City, Christopher Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, William Burns, Director, CIA, Harris, APRN, FCC Forrest City, Thomas, HIT, FCC Forrest City Defendant, Michael Horowitz, Inspector General, Department of Justice, Jonathan Dean Ross, United States Attorney, Department of Justice, Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Executive Agency, Does, Director, DSCC, Federal Bureau of Prisons; FBI Agents/Informants; CIA Officers or CHS's; Pharmacist, FCC Forrest City, A. Smith, Dentist, BOP, Y. Vang, Dental Hygenist, BOP, Michael Carvajal and Antony J. Blinken |
| 24-1639 |
| March 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Recommended Disposition 10/11/23, Order 12/18/23, Judgment 12/18/23, Order 3/26/24, nocket entries, [5377301] [24-1639] (AEV) [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:21 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5377293] [24-1639] (AEV) [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
