Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kasali v. Bradley
as 7:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Warden Patricia V. Bradley, Kimberly Neely, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Teryaeva-Reed v. Garrett et al
as 7:2021cv01279
Petitioner:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, JA Keller, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindberg v. Cohen et al
as 2:2021cv00415
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Alan Cohen
Plaintiff:
Greg E. Lindberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jeffery Keller, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldissi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matt Aldissi and Mahmoud Aldissi
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, Alan Cohen, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edgerson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keller, Walter Woods, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
James Ivory Edgerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00881
Defendant:
Walter Wood, Hugh Hurwitz, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Bradford Lamar Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
