Joe Navarro v. R. C. Johnson et al
Joe Navarro |
R. C. Johnson, Co-conspirators all of them, CMO Medical, D Hernandez, R. Steven and CSP-EMO |
2:2021cv01417 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald SW Lew |
James V Selna |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $45.20 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Joe Navarro on 3/29/2021, receipt number SA017108, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P), #7 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (eva) Modified on 3/29/2021 (eva). |
Filing 8 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. The Complaint is hereby dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff must elect to proceed with one of the following options by no later than April 19, 2021. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth granting REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #6 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $48.34 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (kh) |
Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Joe Navarro. (hr) |
Filing 5 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-01417 JVS(ADS). (rn) |
Filing 4 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING FAILURE TO PAY FEES OR FILE IFP REQUEST by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fees, (2) file an IFP Request along with the necessary accompanying documents, an authorization for disbursement of funds and a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement, or (3) show cause why he is unable to do so by no later than March 22, 2021. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank CV-60P Form) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants CMO Medical(Medical Officer, in individual capacity), CMO Medical(Medical Officer, in official capacity), CSP-EMO, Co-conspirators all of them, D Hernandez(in individual capacity), D Hernandez(in official capacity), R. C. Johnson, R. C. Johnson, R. Steven(Director of Medical, in individual capacity), R. Steven(Director of Medical, in official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D Spaeth, filed by plaintiff Joe Navarro. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.