David Nahman v. City of Los Angeles et al
| David Nahman |
| T-Mobile USA, Inc., Joseph Sierra, City of Los Angeles, John Rogers, Dale Drummond, Merav Wolf, Meital Manzuri, John Dunlap, Adan Montalban, City of Beverly Hills and County of Los Angeles |
| 2:2021cv02080 |
| March 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| John E McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 50 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #19 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Adan Montalban. (Lieber, Megan) |
| Filing 49 Mail Returned addressed to Nicholas David Lauber re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held #43 . (et) |
| Filing 48 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OPPOSITION AND THE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY THE DEFENDANT JOHN ROGERS re: Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #39 filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (et) |
| Filing 47 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OPPOSITION AND THE OPPOSITION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #32 filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (et) |
| Filing 46 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #19 filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (et) |
| Filing 45 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa W Lee counsel for Defendants City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap. NICHOLAS D. LAUBER is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND JOHN DUNLOP. (Lee, Lisa) |
| Filing 44 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa W Lee counsel for Defendants City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap. Adding LISA W. LEE, Deputy City Attorney as counsel of record for DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND JOHN DUNLOP for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND JOHN DUNLOP. (Attorney Lisa W Lee added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Lisa W Lee added to party John Dunlap(pty:dft))(Lee, Lisa) |
Filing 43
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 39) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the Motion no later June 7, 2021. Defendants may reply to the opposition no later than June 21, 2021. This matter will be deemed submitted on either: (a) the day the opposition is filed, or due and not filed; or (b) the day the reply is filed, or due and not filed. The parties will be notified of the Court's decision in writing. [See document for further details.] (es)
|
| Filing 42 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #39 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 41 Plaintiff's Notice of Opposition and the Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by The City of Beverly Hills and Dale Drummond #25 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (es) |
| Filing 40 Plaintiff's Notice of Opposition and the Opposition to Defendant Merav Wolf's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint #17 filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (es) |
| Filing 39 Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant John Rogers. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Bush, Brian) |
| Filing 38 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form #37 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #36 by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The document is stricken. (san) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #36 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Motion is set with an incorrect date and time before the wrong judge. Counsel is advised to review Judge McDermotts' Schedules and Procedures page which can be found on the Court's website. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 36 **STRICKEN** NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant John Rogers. Motion set for hearing on 6/14/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Brian Mathew Bush added to party John Rogers(pty:dft)) (Bush, Brian) Modified on 5/20/2021 (san). |
|
Filing 35
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. #25 ) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the Motion no later June 4, 2021. Defendants may reply to the opposition no later than June 18, 2021. This matter will be deemed submitted on either: (a) the day the opposition is filed, or due and not filed; or (b) the day the reply is filed, or due and not filed. The parties will be notified of the Court's decision in writing. [See document for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 34
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 32) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the Motion no later June 4, 2021. Defendants may reply to the opposition no later than June 18, 2021. This matter will be deemed submitted on either: (a) the day the opposition is filed, or due and not filed; or (b) the day the reply is filed, or due and not filed. The parties will be notified of the Court's decision in writing. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 33 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Joseph Sierra, T-Mobile USA, Inc., identifying 1. Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.; T-Mobile US, Inc.; Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V.; T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH; T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH; Deutsche Telekom AG. 2. Defendant Joseph Sierra. (Horn, Robert) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Joseph Sierra, T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Motion to Dismiss) (Attorney Robert H Horn added to party Joseph Sierra(pty:dft), Attorney Robert H Horn added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Horn, Robert) |
| Filing 31 ANSWER filed by Defendant Meital Manzuri.(Attorney Meital Manzuri added to party Meital Manzuri(pty:dft))(Manzuri, Meital) |
| Filing 30 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeanne L Tollison counsel for Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond. Adding Jeanne L. Tollison as counsel of record for City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond. (Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party City of Beverly Hills(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Dale Drummond(pty:dft))(Tollison, Jeanne) |
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel K Spradlin counsel for Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond. Adding Daniel K. Spradlin as counsel of record for City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond. (Attorney Daniel K Spradlin added to party City of Beverly Hills(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel K Spradlin added to party Dale Drummond(pty:dft))(Spradlin, Daniel) |
| Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cory M Brente counsel for Defendants City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap. Adding Cory M. Brente as counsel of record for City of Los Angeles and John Dunlop for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles and John Dunlop. (Attorney Cory M Brente added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Cory M Brente added to party John Dunlap(pty:dft))(Brente, Cory) |
| Filing 27 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Adan Montalban, identifying County of Los Angeles; Adan Montalban. (Lieber, Megan) |
| Filing 26 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond, (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Dale Drummond. Motion set for hearing on 6/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party City of Beverly Hills(pty:dft), Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party Dale Drummond(pty:dft)) (Kraus, Roberta) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Docket Nos. 17, 19) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Plaintiff shall file his opposition (either two separate oppositions or a consolidated opposition to both Motions) no later than June 1, 2021. Defendants may file their replies to the opposition(s) no later than June 15, 2021. These matters will be deemed submitted on either: (a) the day the opposition(s) are filed, or due and not filed; or (b) the day the replies are filed, or due and not filed. The parties will be notified of the Court's decision in writing. [See document for detailsd.] (es)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE DEFENDANT MERAV WOLFS NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF DAVID NAHMANS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Merav Wolf. (Doyle, Kelly) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #19 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Adan Montalban. Motion set for hearing on 6/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Lieber, Megan) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): Counsel should review Judge McDermott's Schedules and Procedures page which can be found on the Court's website. Civil motions are heard on Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. or such other time as set by the court after consultation with counsel. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff David Nahman's First Amended Complaint #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Counsel should review Judge McDermott' Schedules and Procedures page which can be found on the Court's website. Civil motions are heard on Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. or such other time as set by the court after consultation with counsel. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant County of Los Angeles, Adan Montalban. Motion set for hearing on 6/7/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE MOTION TO DISMISS) (Attorney Megan K Lieber added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Megan K Lieber added to party Adan Montalban(pty:dft)) (Lieber, Megan) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Merav Wolf, (Doyle, Kelly) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff David Nahman's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Merav Wolf. Motion set for hearing on 6/7/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Kelly Lynn Doyle added to party Merav Wolf(pty:dft)) (Doyle, Kelly) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Electronic Filing re Order on Motion for Order, #15 e-mailed to Nicholas Lauber at nicholas.lauber@lacity.org bounced due to No longer with the Los Angles City Attorney's Office. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ORDER TO THE U.S. MARSHALS TO SERVE THE DEFENDANTS (Docket No. 10) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: The Request is denied as moot as to Defendant Dunlop because he has already answered the FAC. The Request is granted as to Defendants Montalban and Drummond. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, #11 with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANTS City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap.(Lauber, Nicholas) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap, (Lauber, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Referred),,, #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANTS City of Los Angeles, John Dunlap.(Attorney Nicholas David Lauber added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas David Lauber added to party John Dunlap(pty:dft))(Lauber, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) City of Beverly Hills, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Dale Drummond, John Dunlap, Meital Manzuri, Adan Montalban, John Rogers, Joseph Sierra, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Merav Wolf amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff David Nahman(es) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Order to U.S. Marshals to Serve the Defendants filed by plaintiff David Nahman. (es) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant(s) City of Beverly Hills, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Dale Drummond, John Dunlap, Meital Manzuri, Adan Montalban, John Rogers, Joseph Sierra, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Merav Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Summons.1, #2 Summons.2, #3 Summons.3, #4 Summons.4, #5 Summons.5, #6 Summons.6, #7 Summons.7, #8 Summons.8, #9 Summons.9, #10 Summons.10)(es) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-02080 RGK(JEM). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (es) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. [See Order for details.] (san)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (es)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Nahman, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Beverly Hills, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Dale Drummond, John Dunlap, Meital Manzuri, Adan Montalban, John Rogers, Joseph Sierra, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Merav Wolf Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Filed by Plaintiff David Nahman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request as to County of Los Angeles, #3 Summons Request as to Defendant City of Beverly Hills, #4 Summons Request as to Defendant Merav Wolf, #5 Summons Request as to Defendant John Rogers, #6 Summons Request as to Defendant City of Los Angeles, #7 Summons Request as to Defendant Joseph Sierra, #8 Summons Request as to Defendant Meital Manzuri, #9 Summons Request as to Defendant T-Mobile USA, #10 Summons Request as to Defendant Adan Montalban, #11 Summons Request as to Defendant Dale Drummond) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
