Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Dunlap et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01320
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Dunlap and Robyn Dunlap
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goff, et al v Monroe, et al
as 2:2023cv10900
Plaintiff:
travis goff and Misty Goff
Defendant:
David Monroe, Ann Arbor, City of, John Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sussman v. Scripps Mercy Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sussman
Defendant:
Scripps Mercy Hospital, Scripps Health County of San Diego County, Conservators Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
David Nahman v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
David Nahman
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Joseph Sierra, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNLAP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00712
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNLAP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87699
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00982
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
John Dunlap, Jr. v. USA
as 16-3335
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DUNLAP, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dunlap v. USA
as 4:2016cv00054
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Dunlap, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Contreras v. Tuvera et al
as 5:2015cv05510
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Contreras
Defendant:
Fernando Tuvera, Patricia Abrams, Anise Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
