Xiaoye Bai v. Warden of High Desert State Prison et al
Petitioner: Xiaoye Bai
Respondent: Warden of High Desert State Prison and The State of California
Case Number: 2:2021cv04939
Filed: June 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: John D Early
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE filed by Petitioner Xiaoye Bai. (hr)
July 12, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #6 filed by Petitioner Xiaoye Bai (hr)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The Petition is subject to dismissal. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed under Habeas Rule 4 (see document for further details). (Attachments: #1 Blank State Habeas Petition Form) (hr)
June 25, 2021 Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 into the registry of the Court from Xiaoye Bai. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number SA017253. (dve)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. #2 ) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The Court concludes that the appointment of counsel is not warranted at this time. As a result, the Request (Dkt. 2) is DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr)
June 17, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111, #2 CV-69 IFP) (lh)
June 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Post - Conviction Appellate Counsel, filed by Petitioner Xiaoye Bai. (lh)
June 17, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Xiaoye Bai. (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xiaoye Bai v. Warden of High Desert State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden of High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Xiaoye Bai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?