Frederick Newhall Woods v. Danny Samuel
Frederick Newhall Woods |
Danny Samuel |
2:2021cv06895 |
August 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER Re: Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Motion to Dismiss #6 . Pursuant to the Order Requiring Response to Petition, dkt. 4, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Petitioner's opposition, or notice of non-opposition, to the Motion to Dismiss must be served and filed by October 28, 2021. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Respondent Danny Samuel. (Kinney, Brian) Modified on 9/29/2021 (hr). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Brian C. Kinney on behalf of Respondent Danny Samuel. (Attorney Brian Campbell Kinney added to party Danny Samuel(pty:res))(Kinney, Brian) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato that Respondent Danny Samuel file Answer to the Petition not later than 10/15/2021. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 9/30/2021. Traverse due by 11/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (dsb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Frederick Newhall Woods. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE PAID), filed by Petitioner Frederick Newhall Woods. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Frederick Newhall Woods v. Danny Samuel | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Frederick Newhall Woods | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Danny Samuel | |
Represented By: | Brian Campbell Kinney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.