Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Miranda Ramirez v. Samuel, et al.
as 26-3879
Plaintiff:
SAUL MIRANDA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
Warden DANNY SAMUEL, individual, CMC San Luis Obispo, Associate Warden BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, individual, CMC San Luis Obispo, Correctional Officer R. DELGADILLO, individual, CMC San Luis Obispo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3881
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daystar Peterson v. Doe Correction Officers 1-50, et al.,
as 2:2026cv03991
Plaintiff:
Daystar Peterson
Defendant:
Doe Correction Officers, Danny Samuel and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilit Legal Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gus Ramos v. State of California et al
as 5:2026cv01062
Petitioner:
Gus Ramos
Respondent:
State of California, The Attorney General of the State of California and Danny Samuel, Warden of California Men's Colony, State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul P Jolivette v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2026cv01764
Petitioner:
Paul P. Jolivette
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta, Krishna Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Patrick Jolivette v. The People Of The State Of California et al
as 2:2026cv00744
Petitioner:
Paul Patrick Jolivette
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Samuel
as 26-315
Petitioner:
DAVID ROMERO
Respondent:
DANNY SAMUEL, as Warden, California Mens Colony
Ryan James Hoyt v. Danny Samuel
as 2:2025cv12003
Petitioner:
Ryan James Hoyt
Respondent:
Danny Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wendy Vidor et al v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2025cv10535
Plaintiff:
Estate of Matthew Vidor and Wendy Vidor
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Diana Toche, Connie Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
