Edward Palma v. Erica Arnold et al
Edward Palma |
Unconstitutional Foreign Corporation, Erica Arnold, Child Protective Services Child Support Services Department and The State of California |
2:2021cv07424 |
September 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, by October 21, 2021, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's response to this order must be no more than 5 pages. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely respond as ordered may result in the case being dismissed. (dc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL filed by plaintiff Edward Palma, served on 9/16/2021. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Erica Arnold, Child Protective Services Child Support Services Department, Unconstitutional Foreign Corporation Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.(Filing fee$402:PAID), filed by plaintiff Edward Palma. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.