Dahee Choo v. Monty Wilkinson et al
| Dahee Choo |
| Monty Wilkinson, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Michael Valverde, Gary Daniel and Christopher Wray |
| 2:2021cv09498 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 14 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Christopher Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation. (gk) |
| Filing 13 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Gary Daniel, Section Chief of USCIS Los Angeles Field Office. (gk) |
| Filing 12 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Michael Valverde, Acting Associate Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service Center Field Operations: Texas Service Center, National Benefits Center, and Nebraska Service Center. (gk) |
| Filing 11 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services. (gk) |
| Filing 10 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (gk) |
| Filing 9 60-Day Summons Issued re Petition #1 as to Defendant Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General of the U.S. (gk) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by plaintiff Dahee Choo. (Choe, Irene) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment # 4 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 3 CV30.NoticeofInterestedParties NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff DAHEE CHOO, (Choe, Irene) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff DAHEE CHOO. (Choe, Irene) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATIVE RELIEF Receipt No: BCACDC-32445739 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff DAHEE CHOO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I-130 Approval Notice, #2 Exhibit I-485Receipt.ASC.InterviewNotice, #3 Exhibit Proc.Time.ServiceReq.OmbudsmanReq, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CoverSheet.DaheeChoo) (Attorney Irene H Choe added to party DAHEE CHOO(pty:pla))(Choe, Irene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
