Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv03724
Plaintiff:
Edward Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitzgerald, et al v. Zuckerberg, et al
as 26-5099
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT FITZGERALD and TINA FITZGERALD
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., META PLATFORMS, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MARK ZUCKERBERG and others
Feng v. Formal FBI Christopher Wray, et al
as 3:2026cv06032
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Ya-Wen Feng
Defendant:
Carl Lee, Angelina Cheng, City Of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodyear et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2026cv01816
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Goodyear and Lori Jo Valenti
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzalez, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Blanche
as 26-30209
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson, III
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the United States of America, Christopher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States of America and others
In re: Hoid
as 26-1111
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent:
JASON MALTERUD, JEFF SATUR, JOSHUA BURKE and others
PINZON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2026cv01293
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM G. PINZON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and GAVIN NEWSOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
FRANKLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 4:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D FRANKLIN
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and DESTINY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv01358
Plaintiff:
Edward Herbert Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
