Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edington v. Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking et al
as 3:2024cv08028
Petitioner:
Daniel C Edington
Respondent:
Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnston v. Wray
as 4:2020cv00520
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnston
Defendant:
Christopher Wray and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gray v. Trump et al
as 4:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Gray and Jennifer Ann Lerma
Defendant:
Michael Pompeo, State Department, Donald J Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adlerstein et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 4:2019cv00500
Plaintiff:
Jeff Valenzuela, Alex Mensing and Ana Adlerstein
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, United States Customs and Border Protection, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Sherlund v. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Defendant:
Thomas E Brandon, United States of America, Jefferson B Sessions, III and others
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Sherlund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
