Melike Dewey v. Superior Court of California, County of Ventura et al
Plaintiff: Melike Dewey
Defendant: Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, Erik Nasarenko, Alexa Leibl, Department of Justice, Does 1-10, in their individual capacites, Gavin Newsom and Rob Bonta
Case Number: 2:2021cv09834
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Referring Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Granting #9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Melike Dewey. (es)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, In light of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed on January 24, 2022, the Court's January 10, 2022, Order to Show Cause is hereby discharged. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is presently screening the First Amended Complaint in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Until the First Amended Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon defendant(s). Should the Court determine that the First Amended Complaint may be served upon defendant(s), the Court will provide plaintiff with instructions regarding service of process. re Order to Show Cause, #6 , Amended Complaint #7 . [See order for further details.] (es)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Department of Justice, Alexa Leibl, Erik Nasarenko, Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by plaintiff Melike Dewey(es)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, no later than January 24, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's timely filing of one of the following will constitute a satisfactory response to this Order to Show Cause: (1) A First Amended Complaint that remedies the pleading deficiencies discussed in this Order; or (2) a signed Notice of Dismissal requesting a voluntary dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). This Order places plaintiff on notice that the assigned District Judge will dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, or fails to file an appropriate response. [See document for further details.] (Attachments: #1 Attach 1 of 2, #2 Attach 2 of 2) (es)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for pre-trial proceedings. All future pleadings shall be addressed to Christianna Howard, Clerk to Magistrate Judge Abrams, Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is presently screening the complaint in this action. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. re Complaint - (Referred), #1 (ch)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ghap)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Melike Dewey. (ghap)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants Department of Justice, Alexa Leibl, Erik Nasarenko, Superior Court of California, County of Ventura. (ghap)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Department of Justice, Does 1-10, in their individual capacities, Alexa Leibl, Erik Nasarenko, Superior Court of California, County of Ventura Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L Abrams.(Filing fee$402:PAID), filed by plaintiff Melike Dewey. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melike Dewey v. Superior Court of California, County of Ventura et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melike Dewey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Court of California, County of Ventura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erik Nasarenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexa Leibl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, in their individual capacites
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gavin Newsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rob Bonta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?