In Re Brandon Sattler
James Russell, Grant Whitcher and Julie Russell |
Brandon Sattler |
2:2021mc00754 |
April 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Plaintiffs James Russell, Julie Russell, Grant Whitcher and against Brandon Sattler in the principal amount of $13,734,599.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of 0.00, costs of $0.00. RE: MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451), #1 (shb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: If there are no amounts for principal, attorney fees, costs or interest, please enter a zero (0) on each line. Attested date must be left blank. The term "plus contractual" is not acceptable. Please place "$0" or a dollar amount. Also, do not fill in the attested date, that area is filled in by the clerk.. (yl) |
Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-31193472 - Fee: $49, filed by Plaintiffs James Russell, Julie Russell, Grant Whitcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney William M Noall added to party James Russell(pty:pla), Attorney William M Noall added to party Julie Russell(pty:pla), Attorney William M Noall added to party Grant Whitcher(pty:pla))(Noall, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.