Cases 1 - 10 of 256
Russell et al v. Mead Johnson & Co. LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03317
Plaintiff:
Melissa Russell and James Russell
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Co. LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. YOUNG
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PACE
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDY PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James King, II
as 24-1089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RUSSELL KING, II, aka Jake King
Adams et al
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Adams, Toni Michelle Adams, Amy Lester Astin and others
Defendant:
Bordeau Metals Southeast, LLC, BB&K Holdings, LLC, BB&K Holdings TN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
MARKWITH v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
JAMES RUSSELL MARKWITH
Respondent:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Russell v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-2967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Storey v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
James Russell Storey
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Kyle Dodson, Taylor Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09794
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oden v. Lewis
as 6:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Russell Oden
Defendant:
Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
